|Numero di pubblicazione||WO1998018982 A1|
|Tipo di pubblicazione||Richiesta|
|Data di pubblicazione||7 mag 1998|
|Data di registrazione||31 ott 1997|
|Data di priorità||31 ott 1996|
|Numero di pubblicazione||PCT/1997/62, PCT/BR/1997/000062, PCT/BR/1997/00062, PCT/BR/97/000062, PCT/BR/97/00062, PCT/BR1997/000062, PCT/BR1997/00062, PCT/BR1997000062, PCT/BR199700062, PCT/BR97/000062, PCT/BR97/00062, PCT/BR97000062, PCT/BR9700062, WO 1998/018982 A1, WO 1998018982 A1, WO 1998018982A1, WO 9818982 A1, WO 9818982A1, WO-A1-1998018982, WO-A1-9818982, WO1998/018982A1, WO1998018982 A1, WO1998018982A1, WO9818982 A1, WO9818982A1|
|Inventori||Furtado Wilson Alves, Dos Santos Laudemar Duarte|
|Candidato||Furtado Wilson Alves, Dos Santos Laudemar Duarte, Ferragens Haga S A|
|Esporta citazione||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citazioni di brevetti (2), Citazioni diverse da brevetti (1), Con riferimenti in (3), Classificazioni (12), Eventi legali (7)|
|Link esterni: Patentscope, Espacenet|
Specification of the Patent of Invention for: "AN ALKALINE ELECTROLYTIC BATH AND A PROCESS FOR ELECTRODEPOSITION OF Cu, Zn, OR Ni, AS WELL AS THEIR ALLOYS"
Field of the Invention
The present invention refers to alkaline electrolytic baths which can be used for electrodeposition of metals and metallic alloys onto equally metallic surfaces, said baths being free from cyanides. Background of the Invention In view of the increasing need for less harmful materials, which reduce the environment contamination, experts have been trying to develop electrolytic baths which are free from cyanide ion. because this is an extremely toxic product.
Various compositions for electrodeposition baths are known, which replace the cyanide ion by other compounds capable of providing good results with regard to the quality of the final metallic layer. These compounds include some aliphatic amines which are already cited in documents of the prior art as being a component suitable for preparing electrolytic baths free from cyanide.
US Document 4,889,602, for example, describes an electrolytic bath for deposition of a zinc-nickel alloy coating, which comprises aliphatic amines in its composition. According to the bath claimed in this document, the composition thereof should contain an electrolyte selected from the group consisting of alkaline hydroxides, and its pH value should necessarily be above 11, to provide the desired results.
Also the US patent document with publication number HI 136 presents an electrolytic solution for deposition of silver, which comprises, as essential components, an aliphatic amine and an alkaline hydroxide.
Still other documents of the prior art already describe the use of aliphatic amines in electrolytic baths, which, however, should be complexed or stabilized with determined specific compounds to avoid the adverse effect of formation of a salt precipitate of the metal to be deposited, which tends to accumulate in the electrolytic bath and consequently impair the final result.
This is the case of JP 61006997, which discloses an electrolytic bath free from cyanide which, in addition to the source compound of the metal to be deposited and other compounds, for example, triethanolamine, also comprises sulfamic acid or its salt as a stabilizing compound. Documents US 5,302,278 and JP 54,155,132 describe bath compositions for electrodeposition of monovalent metals containing aliphatic amines together with thiosulphate and an organic sulfinate stabilizer.
Another document which foresees the use of aliphatic amines in electrolytic baths free from cyanide ions is US 5,538,617. This document claims the use of compounds such as diethyl hydroxylamine as an additive specifically for halogenated eloctrolytic solutions for electrodeposition of tin. The amine may be used either alone or in combination with other compounds such as, for example, hydroquinone. However, the bath described in the mentioned US document is clearly indicated for specific electrodeposition of tin, and there is no other mention of the possibility of using or even adapting the bath composition defined therein so as to enable the use thereof for electrodeposition of other metals or metallic alloys. In addition, figures 6 and 7 make it clear that, even though the various additives mentioned therein can be used either alone or combined with each other, the recent studies carried out by the inventors of that composition have reached the conclusion that the most effective combination, which effectively would present a synergetic effect, would comprise hydrokinone and citric acid.
Document JP 57002890 describes a stabilizer for electrodeposition baths of gold selected, among others, from amines or, alternatively, hydroquinone. On the other hand, document US 5,145,572 refers to the pre-treatment of a catalytically activated metallic surface, prior to the step of electrodepositing metal, in which one uses organic compounds containing nitrogen such as aliphatic amines, or non-nitrogenated compounds, for example, hydroquinone.
The use of quinones associated with electrolytic solutions is already known from other documents of the prior art. Document US 5,021,135 describes a method for treating spent electrolytic baths by employing hydroquinone as a chelating agent, which will react with the metal ions that contaminate such baths. After addition of the chelating agent, the contaminated solutions are subjected to filtration and ion- exchange processes, and then return to the bath proper. Still other solutions for specific electrodeposition of Sn, Ag, Pb and Au are known, which contain hydroquinone, which, however, should be associated to determined specific compounds that are always essential to provide the preparation of a coating of said metals. Summary of the Invention The present invention refers to an alkaline bath for electrodeposition of Cu, Zn or Ni, as well as their alloys, said baths being free from cyanide, containing at least one source of metal or alloy to be deposited and a complexing agent wherein a combination of at least one aliphatic amine and a quinone is used as the complexing agent.
Another embodiment of the invention is a process for electrodeposition of Cu, Zn or Ni, as well as their alloys, comprising the use of an electrolytic bath free from cyanide, containing at least one source of the metal or alloy to be deposited and a complexing agent which comprises a combination of at least one aliphatic amine and one quinone. Detailed Description of the Invention The electrolytic bath composition of the present invention is suitable for the electrodeposition of Ni, Zi, Cu, or their alloys onto any metallic surface. It has been surprisingly found that the complexing effect of the aliphatic amines, when used in baths for electrolytic deposition of the mentioned metals, in replacement of cyanide ions, can be improved by the simultaneously use of quinones. Such complexing effect, as defined herein, relates to the reaction of the aliphatic amine with the metalsource-compounds in question, thus preventing them from remaining free to form salts with the ions of the electrolyte present, which reduce the electrolytic power of the bath as a whole. The quinone, in turn, increases and stabilizes this complexing power, causing the combination of these compounds to present a much better effective result than it would happen if they were used either alone or in combination with other compounds known from the prior art. The aliphatic amine together with the quinone reduces the so-called chemical "drag out" of the source- metals, thus increasing the durability of the bath, without the need of using any other compounds stabilizing the electrolytic composition. For the purposes of the invention, one or more aliphatic amines are used, preferably mono-, di- or triethanolamine is used, more preferably monoetanolamine is used. For combination with the aliphatic amine, the preferably used quinone is hydroquinone.
The complexing agent, that is to say, the aliphatic amine/quinone combination is advantageously used so as to provide a total amount ranging from 1 to 100 g/L, based on the total volume of the bath, preferably from 10 to 100 g/L, and more preferably from 20 to 60 g/L. Generally the weight amine/quinone ratio lies preferably in the range from 10.000/1 to 100/1.
The solution described herein is ideal for baths of electrodeposition of Zn, Cu and Ni, as well as their alloys and, as the source of these metals or alloys, any compound that is conveniently employed for this purpose can be used, such as sulphates, carbonates, chlorides, or oxides. Depending upon the specific metal or alloy to be deposited, hydrated nickel sulphate, nickel carbonate, copper (II) chloride, hydrated copper sulfate, zinc oxide, hydrated zinc sulphate, or zinc carbonate are preferably used. Among them, the preferred ones are hydrated nickel sulphate, copper (II) chloride and zinc oxide. The amounts of the metal source compounds in the composition will be determined according to each particular bath, but usually they should be within the range which provides from 0.1 to 50 g/L of the metal, based on the total volume of the bath, preferably between 1 and 50 g/L, and more preferably from 5 to 20 g/L.
Of course, the electrolytic bath described herein also contains current- conducting components, which, however, are conventional and non-determinant of the invention; they can be chosen, for instance, from the group consisting of carbonates, bicarbonates, hydroxides, and chlorides. Preferably, either bicarbonates or chlorides are used, and more preferably they are selected from sodium bicarbonate or ammonium chloride. These electrolytes are usually employed in concentrations ranging from 1 to 80 g/L of bath, preferably from 1 to 20 g/L.
In addition to the metal source compounds, the complexing aliphatic amine/quinone combination and the electrolyte, the electrolytic bath of the invention may contain other conventional additives, which may be promptly selected by any person skilled in the art, depending upon the particular desired results.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the electrolytic bath composition of the invention further comprises a soluble gluconate salt. The gluconate enhance the complexing power of the bath, reacting with the metal source compounds which may possibly not react with the amine and still remain free. The soluble gluconate salt may be selected, for example, from either sodium gluconate or potassium gluconate and may be used in a concentration ranging from 0 to 300 g/L, based on the total volume of the bath, and more preferably from 50 to 150 g/L. The addition of gluconate is particularly useful when the electrolytic baths according to the invention are employed for electrodeposition onto substrates of zinc and its alloys.
When the electrolytic bath is used for deposition of a decorative layer of zinc, the use of the complexing combination according to the invention provides excellent results in the final colorpattern and in the deposition rate, without the disadvantages of the baths previously known. For example, there is no need for using either alkaline hydroxides or pyrophosphates in the electrolyte, which represents a considerable technical advance, since the former prevent the utilization of this type of bath for deposition of nickel onto zinc alloys of the "zamac" type, due to the high pH value they impart to the baths, whereas the pyrophosphates are known to be toxic. The present electrolytic composition still has the advantage of providing a longer useful life, even in the case of a later brass application, since copper and zinc ions which are also present in the brass and which are trailed into the bath during the brass application do not function as contaminants of the process if the present complexing agent is used. A preferred bath for electrodeposition of Ni comprises from 1 to 50 g/L of nickel used as hydrated nickel sulphate, from 20 to 100 g/L of aliphatic amine and from 0.01 to 0.1 g/L of hydroquinone and from 1 to 2 g/L of ammonium chloride. It is further possible to obtain a graphite-colortonality by adding from 0.1 to 1 g/L of zinc oxide, all of the concentrations mentioned herein being based on the total volume of the bath.
Electrolytic baths for deposition of copper are also advantageously obtained in accordance with the invention. By using a complexing agent which combines aliphatic amine and quinone, a composition is obtained the metal contents of which are lower than in the baths treated with a cyanide, thus providing less drag out of chemical products to washing waters. This bath also enables the use of brightening additives, such as, for example, EDTA, which enhances the brightness and leveling of the base material. In a preferred embodiment, the alkaline bath of copper comprises from 5 to 20 g/L of copper as copper (III) sulphate, from 20 to 60 g/L of aliphatic amine, from 0.02 to 0.2 g/L of hydroquinone and from 20 to 80 g/L of sodium hydroxide, all the concentrations being based on the total volume of the bath.
In another embodiment, the invention relates to a process for electrodeposition of Cu, Zn, or Ni, as well as their alloys, which one comprises the use of an alkaline electrolytic bath free from cyanide containing at least one source of the metal or alloy to be deposited and a complexing agent which comprises the combination of at least one aliphatic amine and one quinone. In this process there is no limitation as to the type of equipment or process parameters, such as types of anode, density of current, pH, etc., which are those conveniently employed and can be determined by those skilled in the art.
Generally, the electrolytic solutions of the present invention have a longer useful life and higher deposition rate, if compared with solutions which use only one of the above-mentioned components. In addition, the baths as now claimed provide greater color stability of the deposited layer, permit greater control of the process parameters and, of course, have the considerable advantage of being less harmful to the environment, since they do not utilize highly toxic compounds such as cyanide ion
Another advantage achieved with the present invention is the considerable reduction of costs with the preparation and maintenance of the electrolytic compositions, since it enables the use of metal source compounds and of less expensive electrolytes than those which used to be necessarily employed for each type of bath.
The invention will be better illustrated by the examples given below.
Example 1 - Decorative Nickel Bath with Graphite-Color Tonality
An electrolytic bath was prepared with hydrated nickel sulphate providing 5 g/L of Ni°, based on the total volume of the bath. 40 g/L of monoethanolamine and 0.01 g/L of hydroquinone were added. In addition, ammonium chloride in a concentration of 2 g/L and 10 g/L of sodium bicarbonate were used. The pH was maintained within a range of 9.5 and 10.5 and electrolytic nickel anodes were employed in the operation, using a current density of 0.5 A dm2. The bath was maintained at room temperature under air stirring. To obtain a graphite-coloration 0.4 g/L of ZnO was added.
It was found that the above composition can be employed as a reinforcement in a cyanide-based bath, enabling the transformation thereof into a cyanide-less bath.
Comparative Example 1
A bath for electrodeposition of nickel with graphite-color tonality was prepared in the same way as in example 1, except for the monoethanolamine and the hydroquinone, which were replaced with an amount of 20 g/L of sodium cyanide together with 2 g/L of sodium pyrophosphate.
The results obtained during the operation of the two baths are shown in comparative table 1 :
Characteristic Example 1 Comparative Example 1 ; (without cyanide) (with cyanide)
1) color pattern more homogeneous less homogeneous 2) deposition time 7.5 min. 10 min (medium size rectangular piece)
3) Useful life > 8 months 6 months
4) Anodes without passivation with passivation
5) Pyrophosphates absent necessary
6) Toxicity low high
The data of Table 1 clearly indicate that during the operation of the bath prepared in accordance with the invention, the anodes do not polarize and the achieved color pattern, as well as other deposition parameters, were regarded as improved with respect to those achieved with a bath treated with cyanide.
Example 2 - Alkaline Copper Bath An electrolytic bath was prepared by adding copper (II) sulphate so as to provide a Cu° content of 10 g/L based on the total bath. 20 g/L of monoethanolamine and 0.02 of hydroquinone were added. Also sodium hydroxide was used in a concentration of 60 g/L. The process of copper electrodeposition was carried out by employing electrolytic copper anodes and a current density of 1.0 A dm2. The bath was maintained at room temperature under mechanical stirring and continuous filtration.
The resulting electrolytic composition enabled the deposition of a layer of copper of excellent quality and brightness superior than that of alkaline baths treated with cyanide.
Example 3 - Alkaline Copper Bath for Electrodeposition onto Zinc Alloys (Ex.:
An electrolytic bath was prepared by adding copper (II) sulphate so as to provide a Cu° content of 20 g/L based on the total bath. 10 g/L of triethanolamine, 0.02 g/L of hydroquinone and 100 g/L of sodium gluconate were added. Also sodium hydroxide in a concentration of 20 g/L was used. The process of copper electrodeposition was carried out by employing electrolytic copper anodes and a density of current of from 1.0 to 2.0 A/dm2. The bath was maintained at 50° C under mechanical stirring and continuous filtration.
The resulting electrolytic composition enabled the deposition of a layer of copper of excellent quality and with high brightness.
Example 4 - Transformation of a Cyanidric Brass Bath into a non-Cyanidric one To a brass bath containing the following composition:
Zn° = 10 g/L in the form of zinc cyanide Cu° = 10 g/L in the form of copper cyanide NaCN (free) = 5 g/L NaCN (total) = 25 g/L Na2CO3 = 10 g/L
a mixture of 2 L of monoethanolamine + 0.02 g of hydroquinone was added daily until the washing waters did not show the presence of cyanide any longer.
The concentrations of Cu° and Zn° were maintained by means of electrolytic copper and zinc anodes and, when necessary, by adding either copper (II) chloride or ammoniacal zinc dissolved in monoethanolamine, to maintain the concentrations of copper and zinc at about 10 g/L.
This procedure enabled the deposition of brass without contamination of the washing waters with cyanide in contents higher than 0.2 g/L, which is the maximum contents permitted by the legislation in force in Brazil.
|Brevetto citato||Data di registrazione||Data di pubblicazione||Candidato||Titolo|
|US4871429 *||29 apr 1988||3 ott 1989||Learonal, Inc||Limiting tin sludge formation in tin or tin/lead electroplating solutions|
|US5538617 *||8 mar 1995||23 lug 1996||Bethlehem Steel Corporation||Ferrocyanide-free halogen tin plating process and bath|
|1||*||DATABASE WPI Section Ch, Week 8210 Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A97, AN 82-18376E XP002058106 & JP 57 016 192 A (KIZAI KK)|
|Brevetto con rif.||Data di registrazione||Data di pubblicazione||Candidato||Titolo|
|CN102127783A *||25 gen 2011||20 lug 2011||九星控股集团有限公司||Method for preparing copper-based microcrystalline coating on aluminum surface|
|EP1300487A1 *||4 ott 2001||9 apr 2003||Shipley Co. L.L.C.||Plating bath and method for depositing a metal layer on a substrate|
|US6773573||2 ott 2001||10 ago 2004||Shipley Company, L.L.C.||Plating bath and method for depositing a metal layer on a substrate|
|Classificazione internazionale||C25D3/38, C25D3/02, C25D3/12, C25D3/58|
|Classificazione cooperativa||C25D3/02, C25D3/38, C25D3/58, C25D3/12|
|Classificazione Europea||C25D3/38, C25D3/02, C25D3/58, C25D3/12|
|7 mag 1998||AK||Designated states|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH HU IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM
|7 mag 1998||AL||Designated countries for regional patents|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): GH KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT
|2 lug 1998||DFPE||Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)|
|16 set 1998||121||Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application|
|2 set 1999||REG||Reference to national code|
Ref country code: DE
Ref legal event code: 8642
|9 feb 2000||122||Ep: pct app. not ent. europ. phase|
|30 apr 2000||NENP||Non-entry into the national phase in:|
Ref country code: CA