Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Review of Elementary 2.04 "Poison Pen": Whoops, I did It Again!


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Review of Elementary 2.04 "Poison Pen": Whoops, I did It Again!

19 Oct 2013

Share on Reddit


Warning: spoilers below.

“Poison Pen,” season two’s fourth episode of Elementary, cowritten by show creator Robert Doherty and Liz Friedman and directed by Andrew Bernstein, is a decent if unspectacular episode of the offbeat mystery show. This time out, Holmes (Johnny Lee Miller) and Watson (Lucy Liu) are called in by a dominatrix Holmes happens to know (one of the recurring motifs in the show is the eclectic and highly convenient collection of people with whom Holmes is acquainted) to investigate the dead body she found upon arriving for a good evening’s workout.
After a rather perfunctory and rather implausible red herring involving a co-worker putting the victim’s body into a bondage outfit, the main narrative settles in: our victim was poisoned with nitroglycerine, the same method used years ago to murder an abusive father, whose daughter, accused but acquitted of the crime and now living under an assumed name, just happens to be the victim’s nanny. Is she up to her old tricks, or is she being framed, as a convenient scapegoat? And if the latter, who has discovered her identity?

The plot is satisfactorily convoluted, involving multiple plausible suspects, including in addition to potentially naughty nanny Anne Barker/Abigail Spencer (Laura Benanti), the victim’s wife (played by Noelle Beck) whose alibi is that she couldn’t have done it because she was busy planning to murder her husband when he was murdered—said plan being the exact method whereby he was murdered—and the victim’s son, who, it turns out, was being sexually abused by his father. Pluses (in addition to the delightfully convoluted alibi) include Watson’s growing analytical skills—displayed here when she sees instantly that Holmes knows more about the nanny than he’s telling, and when she deduces the hiding place of the murdered man’s tablet, which contains crucial evidence.
Another plus is more insights into Holmes’s past. Presumably, creator Doherty cowrote the episode in part to build into it important backstory elements about the abuse Holmes himself suffered when he was a boarding student—of an age with suspect Graham Delancey (Samuel H. Levine). We are left to infer that Holmes experienced sexual abuse—as suggested by his invitation to Graham to talk with Holmes about what happened (an exceedingly rare attempt at human sympathy from the almost pathologically inward-directed Holmes—who at times makes me think of a more serious Sheldon from CBS sister show The Big Bang Theory) and the scenes which bookend the episode, in which we see Holmes, first, boxing and “fighting dirty,” as Watson notes—a lesson he learned as a teenaged assaulted at school—and finally, almost frantically working out with a punching bag, evidently attempting to exorcise his own demons.

Less satisfactory is the episode’s invocation of twin clichés of mystery fiction: the whopping great coincidence and the personal connection. Holmes not only comes onto the case because the body is discovered by someone he knows but also discovers that one of the suspects is not merely linked to a similar crime from the past but also happens to be a person with whom he had a sort of relationship.
As a teen, Holmes was fascinated by the Abigail Spencer murder case and corresponded with young Abigail, from which correspondence he deduced her guilt, despite her acquittal. Since double jeopardy prevented her from being retried and since Holmes recognized that the murderer of an abusive father is unlikely to be a continuing threat, he chose never to reveal her guilt. Nevertheless, she was, as the episode makes clear, his “first”—the first murderer he identified, the first murderer into whose mind he saw, and in away, as the explicit identification of her as his “first” suggests, an odd sort of first lover. The psychological implications of this are interesting as adding layers to Holmes’s character, but the concentration of mystery clichés here—coincidence, personal involvement, murderer being a sort of quasi-lover for the detective—weaken the plot, in my estimation. It’s a convenient and economical way to provide back story, perhaps, but it’s also rather threadbare.

     Nevertheless, the episode ends on a strong note of some moral complexity and irony when the actual murdered (Graham) gets away with it because Holmes’s first—the one he let get away with it, basically—confesses to the murder, taking the rap for the abused boy to give him a chance to redeem himself. Holmes doesn’t get his man (or woman) twice in the same episode, despite knowing the truth; this is especially interesting in light of his assertion in last week’s episode that he always gets his man. The show’s willingness to make Holmes undeniably brilliant but also fallible plays well here, and Holmes’s sympathy for both murderers (even to the point of letting them into his life, to an extent—though I think we can be reasonably sure we’ll never see either Abigail/Anne or Graham again) is played effectively by Miller, whose work as Holmes continues to im
So, in short, I found the episode solid but not fully successful. What did you think? Have I been too hard on it? Not hard enough? Or have I missed things? Let me know in the comments!

13 comments:

  1. Congrats on your first post Dom.


    Welcome to the site :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great review! I don't think you were too hard on the episode. I did really like the backstory we got on Holmes. It's also great to see Watson really coming into her own.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nevertheless of what I personally thought of the episode, what I have to say first is, Dominick your writing skills are brilliant! I honestly barely see such a well written TV review. I hope you continue this for the next episodes.

    As for the episode, I enjoyed the dive into Holmes's past, but I agree, some things were a bit too convenient.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for your great and insightful review! I wholeheartedly agree.

    I love the show, but sometimes there are just "oh so many" coincidences...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought sexual abused was already hinted by Sherlock's sexual practices back in season 1, but I suppose this episode could've shed more light on it in case it wasn't clear enough for the audience.


    It does bother me that so far, the one and the first - murderers, that is - in his life have been women, because it strongly suggest Joan Watson is capable of murder or, at the very least, will become a murderer herself at one point of the show.


    It doesn't matter if its a one time event or she makes a career out of it like any of the other two, the pull Joan has on Sherlock - the very quality that makes her the person Holmes wants to spend the rest of his life with, if you will - makes her a strong candidate for it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting. Of course, Watson already HAS killed someone--the patient she lost, which led to her giving up surgery. Not murder, perhaps, but homicide--albeit one that suggests that the idea of killing someone is for Watson horrifying. Holmes himself has shown that he's capable of at least seriously contemplating murder. I don't know, though; this show does have some dark edges to it, but I doubt it's really dark enough to give us Holmes and Watson, happy serial-killing team, or even either or both of them actually killing anyone except under clearly justifiable circumstances. I confess I'd be curious to see what would happen if Watson found herself in a situation in which killing someone seemed to be the only option, or even the best one. Would she have been as willing to let Graham get away with murdering his father? I don't recall the episode giving us her take on that. (And is Holmes's' own clearly frought relationship with his father a factor in his sympathy to Graham? Hmmm.)
    Thanks for the feedback!

    ReplyDelete
  7. It only gets darker if you consider Joan's patient might not have been a mistake, that she gave up on a career in medice because she actually killed and was afraid she could kill again.


    Elementary's Sherlock is not a socipath, and he only considered murder because he thought the one was a victim, not a perpetrator. Once the idea of Irene as a killer sunk in, he chose life, he chose Watson, over the one.


    However, what makes this episode so good is that given Sherlock's infatuation with the criminal mind, the reason he might have been drawn to Joan is the seed of the same trigger he saw in Moriarty and Abigail, which is far more dangerous for Watson than it is for Holmes.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've not seen anything so far to hint that Watson's a sociopath, unless her generally high level of compassion can be seen as over-compensation, but I guess it's possible.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So far, Joan has hinted towards a viligante mentality rather than a serial killer or a sociopath, which is why Sherlock's influence can't be good on her since the trigger can be the loss of inhibitions Sherlock encourages in their line of work.


    What makes this episode so good is that the storyline warns the audience, before it warns the characters, that this could be a problem in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm curious; what has Joan done that suggests to you a disposition towards vigilantism? I'm not saying it's not there, just that nothing leaps to mind for me. (I did miss a few of the season one episodes.)

    ReplyDelete
  11. At the top of my head there's most of her scenes with Alfredo (Sherlock's sponsor), Joan's conversation with the daughter of those Russian spies last season, all her scenes with Irene after she was revealed as Moriarty, etc.


    What makes this episode so good is that it taps into Joan's previously established vigilante mentality, turns it against herself and places her as a potential criminal mind because of Sherlock's connection with her.

    ReplyDelete
  12. At the top of my head there's most of Jon's scenes with Alfredo (Sherlock's sponsor), the conversation with the daughter of those Russian spies last season, all her scenes with Irene after they figured out who was Moriarty, etc.


    What makes this episode so good is that it taps into Joan's previously established vigilante mentality, turns it against herself and places Joan as a potential criminal mind becuse of Sherlock's connection with her.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.