Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Review of Elementary Episode 2.08 "Blood Is Thicker": "I've Got you Under My Skin"


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Review of Elementary Episode 2.08 "Blood Is Thicker": "I've Got you Under My Skin"

15 Nov 2013

Share on Reddit



Spoilers below.

As its title suggests, "Blood is Thicker," the latest episode of Elementary, places family relations front and center, though the title also has a more literal application, in this strong if somewhat predictable episode. Director John Polson returns to helm his fifth episode; the last one he directed was the season opener, "Step Nine," which introduced Mycroft Holmes (Rhys Ifans), also a key character in this episode. Bob Goodman writes his first episode for the show, adding some twists to Holmes's family relationships.

The episode begins with Sherlock (Johnny Lee Miller) and Mycroft sparring on the roof, engaging in singlestick. While this might initially seem like evidence of rapprochement, however--two brothers bonding in time-honored masculine combat (Holmes even comments on brothers hitting each other as a well-established instance of family bonding)--by the end of the episode, more sinister undertones emerge. The developing closeness, it seems, is illusory, with Mycroft's unknown ulterior motives suggesting that the "play" of combat masks a far more real antagonism. Indeed, both men wear masks during their sparring, further suggesting the concealment theme. holmes's innovation of using an egg as the target on the mask, to ensure a hit is unequivocally acknowledged (the broken egg being irrefutible evidence), hints at the underlying fragility of their relationship--especially given how food is used as a recurrent thematic motif in this show.

The murder plot begins with a bang, literally, as a body plummets from a third-story apartment to land atop a delivery van. The victim turns out to be the estranged daughter of billionaire computer/technology guru Ian Gale (guest star William Sadler). Gale has reconnected with his daughter after paying her mother off decades ago to get rid of her. hor him, money mattered more than blood. Conveniently for Gale, the reconciliation coincides with his heart transplant surgery and his concomitant need for a blood donor who shares his unusual blood type. Here we see the literal implications of the title, as the estranged daughter has literally bled for her father to try to help heal him--and will not earn a hefty inheritance for her trouble. However, while this might look like a motive for murde,r it is merely a red herring. We also see here a family dynamic reminiscent of that in the Holmes family, with its own fraught parent/child relationship; Holmes, too, is estranged from his father, but he's far less willing to close the gap, even for money.

But the family complications extend beyond this ostensibly altruistic but selfishly motivated reconnection, albeit in a predictable way. The murderer is all too obviously Gale's wife Natalie (guest star Margaret Colin); we can figure this out, if for no other reason than the recognition factor, Colin being an actress with a long pedigree. The twist is that the victim, Hayley Tyler (Kersti Byran) is really only collateral damage, murdered to obscure the fact that the real target is Ian Gale himself, being murdered by his wife in order to inherit his vast fortune upon his death. Blood is again literally important, as the means of murder is a rather elaborate scheme to create antibodies by injecting Hayley with a piece of Gale's original heart, having her blood produce antibodies to attack this foreign body, and then injecting that blood back into Gale so the antibodies will attack his new heart, thereby making the transplant fail and killing him. I have no idea if this could really work, but it feels a lot more like a murder mystery plot twist than a plausible method of murder. Nevertheless, it does extend and complicate the episode's playing on the dark side of family, the relevance of which to Holmes begins to emerge by the end of the episode.

The primary thrust of the episode in relation to Holmes is to address again the complexities of his relatrionship with family. Mycroft reports that their father wants Holmes to return to London, even intimating that Holmes senior may cut off Sherlock financially should Sherlock refuse. Mycroft seems genuinely interested in reconciling with his brother and helping smooth over the family's past dysfunction. For his part, Holmes is led to consider what he really desires, which leds to a to a stong scene with Watson (Lucy Liu), in which Holmes acknowledges that he has been able to thrive in New York thanks to the support system he has there; the almost pathologically self-sufficient Holmes is becoming increasingly able to recognize the value of "family." In his case, however, blood is not thicker than water, as it is Holmes's surrogate family--Watson, Gregson (Adian Quinn), "even
Bell" (Jon Michael Hill), as Holmes rather amusingly puts it--that have genuinely benefited him. Once again, we have a strong scene between Holmes and Watson as his slow process of emergence develops.

Sadly, it would seem that Holmes's family is possibly as dangerously dysfunctional as the Gale family (perhaps a storm looms for Holmes, as it did for Ian Gale), as we learn by the end of the episode that Mycroft has in fact been lying to his brother. Holmes senior has not been trying to get Holmes back to London; Mycroft is trying to manipulate him back there for reasons unknown, and the episode ends with Mycroft telephoning an unidentified party to report his failure. all we can be sure of is that he has called someone in the UK, as he begins with the international code 44. What is going on here remains to unfold in subsequent episodes, but it seems possible, perhaps even likely, that Mycroft is going to emerge as a major antagonist for Holmes. Was he calling Moriarty? Lestrade (who we met in th efirst Mycroft episode)? someone else we have not yet met? Only the future will tell. I confess a degree of disappointment (though no real surprise) with this development. I'd much prefer to see their relationship heal than to see the show give us what amounts to a pretty hoary cliche of the betrayer close to home. Will Mycroft try to murder Sherlock, as Natalie murdered Ian? Let's hope not!


Who do you think Mycroft is calling? Do you think he's going to become a big bad? How did you like the episode? Let me know in the comments!

28 comments:

  1. disqus_BLvd5NQY3F15 November 2013 at 06:31

    there something more to the ending........it seem Mycroft really want to bring Sherlock back to London for some reason?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, but what? Something nefarious, I assume, given the lying and the mysterious phone call!

    ReplyDelete
  3. From canon Mycroft IS the British government. That call to the UK (country code 44) could be to MI6 or MI5. Mycroft cannot be as stupid as the writers are making him out to be, after all he is Holmes' SMARTER brother. The restaurants are probably undercover rouse. Maybe the British government want Holmes back for an investigation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh, interesting theory! I wasn't aware of his background in canon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Another great review! I love how subtly the show uses symbolism at times. No accident as well that Gale is killed by his dead heart. I'm hoping that Mycroft isn't going to be the big bad and that they just want us to think that. His final call certainly puts a bit of a different spin on his comment that Holmes has really changed. In fact, he's changed so much that Mycroft's elaborate scheme to get him back to the UK doesn't work. Can't wait to see Mycroft again!

    ReplyDelete
  6. From canon Mycroft IS the
    British government. That call to the UK (country code 44) could be to
    MI6 or MI5. Mycroft cannot be as stupid as the writers are making him
    out to be, after all he is Holmes' SMARTER brother. The restaurants are
    probably undercover rouse. Maybe the British government want Holmes back
    for an investigation.

    ReplyDelete
  7. disqus_BLvd5NQY3F15 November 2013 at 08:41

    yea mycroft has to be a government agent and he likely been ordered to recruit sherlock to Mi6 perhaps for assignment
    I wonder if Sherlock deduce that Mycroft is hiding something back from him and we know he better soon than later

    ReplyDelete
  8. Had been somewhat disappointed with the episode, (oh, it's the wife again and there's hardly any Mycroft). Those last two scenes with Mycroft definitely made the episode for me. I also am going to be somewhat relieved if it turns out Mycroft was only pretending to be as dense as he seemed. Someone had posited even before he reappeared that there was going to eventually be a restaurant called 'Diogenes' to reflect the club associated with him in canon. Thought maybe that the opening of a 'branch' in America meant that they were spreading out their fields of operation, but definitely seems like they are bent on getting Sherlock back to England. As I commented previously, I had already wondered if his 'spot of leukemia' might have been due to chemical or radiation exposure related to his job as a restaurateur actually covering his role in government/espionage. Also makes me wonder exactly why he wanted Sherlock in on Nigella's problem--had his 'organization' already suspected some kind of drug cartel involvement that was important to them? It would definitely seem that if he is not 'evil', he is totally cold-blooded in using people to achieve what he wants. If Sherlock has been slowly using the value of social skills as a way of learning how to truly connect with people, it would appear right now that Mycroft is the true sociopath--someone who has learned to mimic his behavior appropriately to the occasion, not because he is truly empathetic, but because that is how he will manipulate others and get what he wants.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Devon Maxwell-Pierce15 November 2013 at 13:09

    This episode was fantastic. Jonny Lee Miller and Lucy Liu are magic together. The scene in the victim's apartment was riveting.

    I think there has to be some connection to Moriarty. I think "the problem" is Watson.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I would prefer that, I must say--and I have been somewhat bothered, I must admit, by the fact that the whole "smarter brother" thing has been quietly ignored so far. but it seems rather an odd way of going about recruiting him. Maybe the writers are playing with the idea in ways that might lead those not familiar with the canon to have suspicions about Mycroft? (Or even those of us that are; I confess I was just assuming that they were changing Mycroft even more than they changed Moriarty.)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great comment! I like it! Thanks for the insights.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks! Me neither! (Or would that be me too?)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Christine Lawrence15 November 2013 at 14:04

    Do you think that Moriarty/Mycroft are trying to split up the partnership of Holmes and Watson? That the target is Watson?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think you're probably right.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Devon Maxwell-Pierce15 November 2013 at 14:25

    Yes. I think Mycroft seducing Watson was an attempt to cause a rift, given the history with the Marchioness. That failed. Then, we see that letter from Moriarty, planting a seed. "Can you really know another person?" with a cut directly to Joan.

    Sherlock and Joan were as close as ever last night, so sleeping with her didn't work. So, he tried to woo Sherlock back to London with threats of financial ruin and his beloved 221B. Maybe Mycroft figured Sherlock would sacrifice to not involve Watson in his woes. The old Sherlock didn't make the connections. The old Sherlock had been controlled by his father's money in the past--in fact, it was the only reason Watson was in his life.

    But THIS Sherlock put on his big boy pants and talked to Watson. Shared his feelings. Instead of Watson saying "I better find something else" she was all "You know what, screw him." She is there with him for more than free rent and a salary. Sherlock is realizing he needs people and he's "no longer on [his] father's teats." LOL.

    Watson is "the problem" he referenced. Who else on this show had a real problem with Watson? Hmmm. They know Sherlock is 1000x stronger and more dangerous with Watson. If Watson is removed, he'd go back to his weaker, more malleable self.

    This is absolutely setting up for a Reichenbach scenario. But in Elementary, I think it'll be Watson to take the fall.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Christine Lawrence15 November 2013 at 15:11

    Wow, I never thought about it like that. That really makes sense, and it's a definite possibility that this could happen. We all know that Moriarity will be coming back soon so...when she returns, she'll be there to cause more trouble? I was thinking that letter was suspicious as well.


    Really enjoy watching the Holmes/Watson partnership and seeing Watson progress with solving murders. It's really amazing seeing the chemistry of JLM and LL onscreen.


    That last thing you said about the Reichenbach scenario, do you think that would a season finale episode? Or just an episode during the season? Amazing thoughts Devon :)

    ReplyDelete
  17. You're forgetting that Mycroft deliberately wanted Sherlock to bring Watson with him. So that's not exactly splitting them up.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Devon Maxwell-Pierce15 November 2013 at 15:58

    Thank you! I think it'll be a cliffhanger. It'll take a summer for Sherlock or Watson to figure out the other's ruse, lol. I think it'll be Watson for a number of reasons, but they might go traditional. I do think the letter from Moriarty was setting up a scenario where trust will be an issue later. Maybe Sherlock will take the fall if Watson or her family are threatened. Maybe Watson will take the fall to remove herself as a tool with which Sherlock can be manipulated. They could go in so many directions. Maybe, like in the X Files episode Gethsemane, they both are in whatever scenario together.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Devon Maxwell-Pierce15 November 2013 at 16:06

    I think that was just a feint, if anything. If Mycroft's goal is to get Sherlock to work in some kind of shadow government, or whatever, then he probably either doubts Joan's willingness to leave NY/her family or he figures "the problem" can be better controlled in England. I admit, it makes you think, but then what's the point of any of it? He's clearly duplicitous. They know that removing Joan weakens Sherlock. I guess that's why I think he's somehow connected to Moriarty.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I don't think he's "clearly" anything. Not yet. And there are lots of explanations other than Moriarty.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Devon Maxwell-Pierce15 November 2013 at 16:13

    Also, I just watched the episode again and he never says he wants Joan to accompany him. I'm not saying he doesn't, but that scene could be taken either way.

    Also, the whole conversation seems like Mycroft is talking about himself. "He got you clean" etc. I've always suspected that Mycroft has been operating in the role of Sherlock's father. Hence all the lack of communication and that ambiguity.

    Wow, I'm thinking a lot about this show, LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Devon Maxwell-Pierce15 November 2013 at 16:16

    He's "clearly" duplicitous, no? He at the very least destroyed the letter. He lied to Sherlock about his motives. He says the "gambit" didn't work, indicating deceit.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I do agree, I think Mycroft is the one behind the rehab and money.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I hope it takes them a while to get to Reichenbach; I'd see that as maybe a season four or five climax. Great speculations, though!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Veeeery interesting speculation!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Oh, I hope not. (well, if the problem is Watson, I don't mind -- but if it's Watson because *Moriarty* wants her out of the way, then I think I won't be happy!)



    In the books, Mycroft is a shadowy figure heavily involved in British national and international affairs at the highest levels. I would hate to see them abandon this cool seed of an additional idea and complication and just have him be a henchman of the big bad that Sherlock's in love with.



    The Moriarty plot as already established certainly has tons more meat on it, but it's also already established. Having Mycroft be something of what he's hinted to be in the books would give them a lot more intrigue and much further depth and opportunities for character and plot development. (not to mention more reasons to bring them back to England at least once a season -- and since the show seems to be fairly popular there, I'd think they might want to ...) Surely they're imaginative enough for this? If they stick to Moriarty-using-others-as-puppets as their only big throughline (other than family and alcoholism affairs) seems to me they'll just be *asking* -- begging, actually -- for the show to run out of steam very quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Oh, you're depressing the heck out of me. I so want Mycroft to be something more than this. And Sherlock to be something bigger than just his relationship with Moriarty.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I only read your review now, since I am late on Elementary, and it is great.
    I believe you are right about the sparring interpretation (masks, eggs), yet I had completely forgotten about it because it was in the beginning of the episode.
    I don't know, but I have a feeling that Mycroft's call has sth to do with Moriarty, even though Mycroft was originally government.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.